|
|
|
GCP - Community for Golf
Cars, NEV's, Utility, Golf Carts, Electric Vehicles, Parts & Accessories.
|
|
|
In the News
Are NEVs Really Cleaner?
August 3, 2007
LINCOLN, California --
People often tout the environmental friendliness of
Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs) as a top reason to buy.
Unfortunately, it's all too easy to forget that much of our
energy comes from "dirty" sources, such as coal and gas.
Aren't NEVs--and electric cars in general--simply shifting the
pollution from one community to another? In short, no.
Photo by Roland Peschetz. Some rights reserved. In the United
States, our electricity comes from a variety of sources. Clean
sources, such as solar and wind, have no adverse en vironmental
impact. On the other hand, coal and gas power plants release
pollution and greenhouse gases. When a NEV is plugged
in, it's getting electricity from the cocktail of sources that
power the grid. While an electric vehicle emits no pollutants
or greenhouse gases when driven, the electricity used for
charging is typically generated in power plants that pollute.
On the other hand, much of the pollution from gas-powered cars
is generated while driving. A car's internal combustion engine
emits pollutants at different rates. When the engine first
starts, the catalytic converter is not working at its optimum
efficiency. Harmful emissions are produced at a higher rate
after a cold start--and are reduced after the engine reaches
its normal operating temperature. That means short trips
around town will produce a greater percentage of emissions per
mile than longer trips. Additionally, the refinement,
transportation and distribution of gasoline produces pollution
before the gas is even burned in a car's engine. |
|
|
What Makes Emissions Bad?

|
So what exactly is this "bad
stuff" that constitutes pollution and greenhouse gases?
Listing all of the gases and their concentrations would surely
lull most readers to sleep, so we'll take a look at only two
of the most significant offenders.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a colorless, odorless gas. At normal
levels, CO2 is essential to the balance of life. After all,
when we exhale CO2, plants absorb it and release oxygen as a
by-product. The problem is that too much carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere acts as a blanket around the earth--it keeps the
warmth in, and the cold out. Thus, the accumulation of excess
CO2 in the atmosphere is a major contributor to global
warming.
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) are a family of various gases that are
produced during combustion. They react with other compounds in
the atmosphere to create the brown clouds of smog we're so
accustomed to seeing in the summer. |
NEVs: Clearly Cleaner
What quantities of these gases are released per mile driven in
a NEV, versus a gasoline powered car? In the chart below,
we'll compare the emissions of an internal combustion engine
with those of a power plant generating enough electricity to
move a NEV the same distance.
Here in California, our electricity is much "greener" than
that of the nation as a whole. With tougher DMV requirements,
our gasoline cars tend to be slightly cleaner as well. To
illustrate the point, we'll provide emissions figures for both
California, and the country as a whole. |
|
|
|
|
CO2 lbs/mile |
NOx lbs/mile
|
|
Internal combustion engine passenger car (U.S. Avg.)
|
0.916
|
0.00306
|
|
Internal combustion engine passenger car (Calif. Avg.) |
0.882
|
0.000903
|
|
NEV charged in an average U.S. location |
0.299
|
0.00000428
|
|
NEV charged in California |
0.136
|
0.000000825
|
|
|
|
Driving a NEV in California
results in the emission of over six times less carbon dioxide,
and over one thousand times less nitrogen oxides when compared
to driving a traditional passenger car. When compared to a
truck or SUV, the reduction is even more dramatic. |
|
|
Shift Emissions Into Neutral
While a NEV is significantly cleaner than a gas car, its
emissions impact can be reduced to nothing through the use of
alternative power sources. Rooftop solar panels (or in some
areas, backyard windmills) allow for emissions-free
electricity generation. With these green options, pollution
doesn't factor into the equation. Residential solar and wind
systems empower NEV owners to be as green as they desire.
Electric vehicle owners who want to neutralize emissions but
can't afford solar have another option: charging at night. In
California, power plants often run even when demand is
low--and thus have excess capacity. Additionally, many
utilities rely on hydroelectric power at night. By charging
after 7:00 P.M., a NEV will have little or no emissions
impact, and will place less strain on the power grid.
Electric motors are significantly more efficient than internal
combustion engines--and they produce no emissions while
driving. Even with power plant emissions considered, the
environmental impact of an electric vehicle is much less than
that of a gas-powered car. While NEV owners appreciate the low
operating cost and convenience for local trips, the whole
community benefits from cleaner air. |
|
Crunching the Numbers
There's a lot of data to digest in order to arrive at the
conclusions in this article. If you're interested in our
sources and calculations, please read on.
According to the California Energy Commission's Demonstration
of Neighborhood Electric Vehicles Consultant Report
P600-02-020F [PDF], published on July 1, 2002, NEVs have an
average power consumption of 0.223 kWh/mile under real-world
driving conditions.
Page 4 of the "Updated State-level Greenhouse Gas Emission
Coefficients for Electricity Generation 1998-2000 [PDF]",
published by the Energy Information Administration in 2002
provides our data for average national emission of CO2 and NOx
per kWh and MWh respectively. According to the report, the
national average of CO2 emissions is 1.34 lbs/kWh. California
emits 0.61 lbs/kWh. Looking at NOx emissions, the national
average is 0.0192 lbs/MWh (0.0000192 lbs/kWh). The state
average for California is 0.0037 lbs/MWh (0.0000037 lbs/kWh). |
|
|
|
Based on these figures, we can now
calculate the CO2 and NOx emissions per mile for a NEV as
follows: |
0.223 kWh * 1.34 lbs/kWh = 0.299
lbs/mile of CO2 based on the national average
0.223 kWh * 0.61 lbs/kWh = 0.136 lbs/mile of CO2 based on the
CA average
0.223 kWh * 0.0000192 lbs/kWh = 0.00000428 lbs/mile of NOx
based on the national average
0.223 kWh * 0.0000037 lbs/kWh = 0.000000825 lbs/mile of NOx
based on the California average |
|
|
The EPA's "Emission Facts" report
(EPA420-F-00-013), published in April of 2000 provides our
data for national passenger car emissions. Page 2 of the
report states that an average passenger car emits 0.916
lbs/mile of CO2, and 1.39 grams/mile (0.003064 lbs/mile) of
NOx.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) publishes a computer
model of auto emissions in the state. Emission Factors 2007
(EMFAC2007) v2.3 is the most current model as of this writing.
This data is significantly more current than the federal data,
and provides a better estimation of California auto emissions.
For the purpose of this article, the California Air Resources
Board provided EMFAC2007 data for average statewide passenger
vehicle emissions of 0.41 grams/mile (0.000903 lbs/mile) of
NOx and 400 grams/mile (0.882 lbs/mile) of CO2.
A separate EMFAC2007 model was run for all passenger vehicles
and light duty trucks (up through 8,500 lbs gross vehicle
weight rating) registered in California in 2005. These include
registered vehicles from model years 1965 through 2005. The
NOx average was 0.00145 lbs/mile and the CO2 average was 1.02
lbs/mile. While these numbers provide a more compelling
advantage for NEVs, there is no way to directly compare them
to the federal "Emission Facts" report since they reflect a
mix of vehicle types. Therefore, the original EMFAC2007
numbers for light autos were used in the comparison. However,
when compared to all vehicles on the road, these numbers show
that NEVs are even more advantageous than we claim in our
comparison.
Of course, every vehicle is different, and the composition of
the power grid changes regularly--usually for the cleaner.
These figures provide a good starting point for comparison of
a NEV's environmental impact to that of an internal combustion
engine passenger car.
|
|
|